UAE Condemns ‘Brazen’ Iranian Missile Attack On Two Oil Tankers In Strait Of Hormuz
Our take
The recent condemnation by the UAE following the alleged Iranian missile attack on two oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz represents a significant escalation of tensions in a vital global chokepoint. The incident, involving the tankers Mombasa and Al Bahiyah, underscores the fragility of maritime trade routes and the potential for disruption to the global energy supply. This event adds another layer of complexity to an already volatile geopolitical landscape and highlights the ongoing need for robust international maritime security measures. The IMO Council's recent reaffirmation IMO Council Reaffirms Commitment To Freedom Of Navigation And Seafarer Safety of freedom of navigation is particularly relevant in this context, emphasizing the fundamental principles at stake. Furthermore, the strategic implications are evident in DP World’s proactive planning DP World Plans New UAE East Coast Port And Container Terminal To Bypass Strait Of Hormuz for alternative port infrastructure, recognizing the vulnerability of relying solely on the Strait of Hormuz.
The Strait of Hormuz is critically important: roughly 20% of the world's oil passes through its narrow waters daily, making it essential for global energy security. Disruptions, whether through military action or heightened geopolitical uncertainty, have immediate and far-reaching economic consequences. The use of cruise missiles in this alleged attack is particularly concerning, suggesting a deliberate and calculated effort to target commercial shipping. While investigations are ongoing to definitively attribute responsibility and assess the full extent of the damage, the accusations against Iran raise serious questions about regional stability and adherence to international maritime law. The historical pattern of incidents in this region, including previous attacks on tankers and escalating naval presence, paints a picture of increasing risk and a potential for miscalculation. The recent US action Watch: In a First, US Strikes Iran’s Bandar Abbas Naval Base Using One-Way Attack Sea Drones demonstrates a willingness to respond to perceived threats, further complicating the situation.
The broader significance of this incident extends beyond the immediate impact on oil prices and shipping lanes. It underscores the potential for asymmetric warfare in maritime environments, where relatively inexpensive technologies like cruise missiles can inflict significant damage and disrupt critical infrastructure. The incident also highlights the challenges of maintaining freedom of navigation in contested waters, where competing national interests and strategic rivalries intersect. The reliance on data and intelligence, including real-time maritime tracking and analysis, is increasingly crucial for mitigating risks and responding effectively to emerging threats. This requires an integrated data ecosystem, validated through empirical observations and calibrated against historical trends, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the maritime domain. Longitudinal data on shipping patterns, climate indicators impacting sea levels and currents, and geopolitical events can all contribute to a more resilient and informed approach to maritime security.
Looking ahead, the situation in the Strait of Hormuz demands a multifaceted response. Diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions and establish clear rules of engagement are paramount, alongside enhanced maritime surveillance and security patrols. The development of alternative shipping routes and port infrastructure, as exemplified by DP World’s plans, represents a proactive strategy for reducing reliance on this vulnerable chokepoint. However, the critical question remains: how can the international community foster a collaborative environment where all stakeholders prioritize the safety and security of maritime trade routes, and prevent further escalation of tensions in this strategically vital region?
The United Arab Emirates has condemned an Iranian missile attack on two of its oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz that killed one Indian crew member and injured eight others.
The attack adds to tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important oil shipping routes, where Iran and the United States have exchanged military actions in recent days.
According to the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the oil tankers Mombasa and Al Bahiyah were hit by two Iranian cruise missiles while sailing through the southern shipping lane of the Strait of Hormuz within Omani territorial waters.
The ministry said one Indian national was killed and eight crew members were injured, including four who suffered serious injuries. Those injured included six Indians and two Ukrainians.
The UAE expressed condolences to the family of the deceased and to the Government and people of India. It also wished the injured a speedy recovery.
In its statement, the ministry said the attack violated UN Security Council Resolution 2817, which supports freedom of navigation and rejects attacks on commercial vessels or the obstruction of international shipping routes.
It added that attacking commercial shipping and using the Strait of Hormuz as a means of economic pressure or blackmail amounted to piracy and threatened regional stability, global trade and energy security.
The UAE called on Iran to stop the attacks, commit to an immediate ceasefire and support the complete and unconditional reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) later confirmed it had struck the two tankers. It said the vessels ignored warnings, switched off their navigation systems and tried to pass through a mined route.
The IRGC said it disabled both vessels and warned that cooperation with what it called the “aggressor enemy” would delay the reopening of the Strait and contribute to an energy crisis.
The tanker attack came as US President Donald Trump announced that the United States would restore a naval blockade on Iranian ports and impose a 20% charge on cargo passing through the Strait of Hormuz.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the blockade would stop “Iran’s ships or customers” from entering or leaving the Strait while allowing other countries to continue using the waterway. He said the measures would take effect at 1600 Eastern Time (2000 GMT) on Tuesday.
Trump said the United States would become the “Guardian of the Hormuz Strait” and that the proposed charge would cover the cost of providing security in the area.
Speaking later at the White House, Trump said the United States was “hitting them very hard.”
“We’re knocking out all of their offensive capability. And we’re controlling the Strait,” he said, adding that he still believed a deal with Iran was possible.
US Central Command (CENTCOM) said it launched strikes on Monday at the president’s direction. It later confirmed attacks on military targets in Bushehr, Chah Bahar, Jask, Konarak, Abu Musa and Bandar Abbas, saying the operation aimed to reduce Iran’s ability to attack commercial shipping.
CENTCOM also said US forces would resume blockading maritime traffic entering and leaving Iranian ports from July 14 while continuing to support vessels that were not violating the blockade.
Iran’s army responded by targeting US military assets in Kuwait, according to Iranian state media.
The IRGC also said it had struck military facilities in Bahrain, including weapons depots, a satellite communications centre and a building housing US forces. Early on Tuesday, it said it had also targeted an air base in Jordan with ballistic missiles.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi responded to Trump’s announcement by saying Iran had always been the “GUARDIAN” of the Strait of Hormuz and would remain so.
Writing on X, Araghchi said Trump was right that those providing safe passage through the Strait should be paid, but added that a 20% charge was too high.
“Iran has always been the GUARDIAN of the Strait and will remain so FOREVER,” he wrote. “20% is of course too much. We will be fair.”
Before Trump’s announcement, Iran’s Khatam al-Anbiya military headquarters said it would not allow the United States to interfere in the management of the Strait of Hormuz.
Its spokesperson, Ebrahim Zolfaghari, said repeated US actions had endangered regional security, international trade and the movement of oil tankers and commercial vessels. He added that any cooperation with the United States would be considered an act of war against Iran’s sovereignty.
The International Maritime Organization (IMO), the UN agency responsible for regulating global shipping, said there was no legal basis for introducing mandatory charges for ships simply passing through international straits.
Oil prices rose following the latest escalation. Brent crude gained 0.7% in Asian trading to $83.87 a barrel after jumping more than 9% on Monday. US crude rose 0.9% to $79.04.
Under international law, coastal states can exercise control over territorial waters extending up to 12 nautical miles from their coastline. At its narrowest point, the Strait of Hormuz and its shipping lanes lie within the territorial waters of Iran and Oman.
According to the information released, Iran effectively closed the Strait after US and Israeli strikes on Feb. 28. Before the disruption, about 25% of the world’s oil and 20% of global liquefied natural gas passed through the waterway.
Iran later launched missiles and drones at Israel and US military bases in several Gulf countries. The IRGC also fired on commercial ships attempting to pass through the Strait without its permission and seized two vessels. Maritime traffic fell sharply, contributing to higher oil prices.
The United States first imposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports in April. About five weeks later, the US military said it had redirected 100 commercial vessels and disabled four under the blockade.
The blockade was lifted in June under a memorandum of understanding aimed at easing the conflict, but tensions over the Strait of Hormuz have since returned.
References: BBC, Emirates247
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience