2 min readfrom Frontiers in Marine Science | New and Recent Articles

A multi-method approach for monitoring deep-sea fishes on a seamount in a marine protected area within the West Mariana Ridge

Our take

Effective marine resource management demands robust monitoring, particularly for vulnerable deep-sea ecosystems. This study presents a multi-method approach to assess fish communities on Ritto Seamount, a marine protected area within the West Mariana Ridge. Combining environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling and visual surveys across two depth strata, utilizing diverse platforms like ROVs and AUVs, revealed low overlap in species detection—highlighting the value of integrated data. Notably, eDNA detected a greater abundance of pelagic species.
A multi-method approach for monitoring deep-sea fishes on a seamount in a marine protected area within the West Mariana Ridge

The increasing pressures on marine ecosystems demand innovative and robust monitoring strategies, particularly within vulnerable deep-sea environments. This recent study, focusing on Ritto Seamount within a Japanese marine protected area, exemplifies this need by employing a multi-method approach to assess fish communities. Building upon previous research demonstrating the benefits of combining environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling and visual surveys Environmental DNA reveals potential trophic links at male sperm whale foraging sites in Northern Norway, this work distinguishes itself through the use of multiple platforms for each method and sampling across two depth strata. The findings underscore the inherent limitations of relying on a single methodology and highlight the potential for a more complete understanding of deep-sea biodiversity when integrating diverse data streams. Such approaches are increasingly vital, particularly as we seek to quantify and manage marine resources sustainably, as demonstrated by the autonomous quantification of kelp biomass using side scan sonar Autonomous quantification of kelp biomass on offshore aquaculture installations using side scan sonar – a testament to the power of innovative data acquisition techniques.

The low community overlap (ranging from 1.4% to 7.7% between methods) reported in this study, while seemingly concerning, is not necessarily unexpected, particularly when compared to shallow reef ecosystems. The significant differences in community composition observed between eDNA and visual surveys, especially at the shallow depth, reveal a nuanced picture of deep-sea fish distribution. The detection of more pelagic species by eDNA, contrasted with the visual surveys' focus on benthic fauna, underscores the importance of considering environmental factors and species behaviors when interpreting data. The research rightly points out that factors like offshore currents and water temperature can significantly influence eDNA dispersal, potentially creating discrepancies between observed presence and actual abundance. The study's meticulous comparison of detection probabilities for different species groups, alongside the observation that certain families were absent from eDNA results, provides valuable insights into the limitations of each method and the necessity of careful calibration and replication in future studies. Further refinement of eDNA sampling strategies, including increased replicate sampling and consideration of hydrological conditions, will be crucial for improving accuracy and reducing bias.

Beyond the immediate findings, this work contributes significantly to the broader field of ocean intelligence by advocating for integrated data ecosystems. The combination of ROV, DSV, AUV, baited cameras, and CTD Niskin data, alongside eDNA metabarcoding, showcases the power of combining diverse data sources to create a more holistic view of the deep-sea environment. This approach aligns with the growing recognition that complex systems like marine ecosystems require multifaceted monitoring strategies. Furthermore, the utilization of data-driven modeling to understand coastal water quality dynamics Data-driven modelling of coastal water quality dynamics provides a useful parallel – demonstrating the potential for leveraging diverse datasets to improve predictive capabilities and inform management decisions. The emphasis on longitudinal studies, as suggested by the researchers, is also critical for tracking changes in community composition and assessing the long-term effectiveness of marine protected areas.

Looking ahead, a crucial question arises: how can we best integrate these diverse data streams into a unified framework that allows for real-time assessment of deep-sea ecosystem health? Developing standardized protocols for data collection and analysis across different methodologies will be essential for ensuring comparability and facilitating collaboration among researchers. Furthermore, the development of sophisticated analytical tools capable of handling the complexities of multi-method datasets will be paramount. As our ability to explore and monitor the deep ocean continues to advance, the integration of diverse data sources, as exemplified by this study, will be the key to unlocking a deeper understanding of these vital ecosystems and ensuring their long-term sustainability.

Management of marine resources is necessary as anthropogenic pressures increase, particularly for vulnerable deep-sea communities. Utilizing non-invasive methodologies (including eDNA sampling and visual surveys) are ideal for surveying protected areas as they do not damage the environment. Previous studies which utilize both eDNA and visual surveys to examine fish communities have noted that employing multiple methods increases species richness and diversity overall, though these comparisons typically only utilize single platforms for each method and sample at a single depth strata. We conducted two surveys (in 2020 and 2024) at Ritto Seamount within one of Japan’s offshore marine protected areas at two depth strata within the benthic boundary layer: shallow (500–700 m) and deep (1, 800–2, 100 m). Multiple platforms (including ROV, DSV, AUV, baited cameras, CTD Niskin, and in situ water filtration) were used, with data combined by method to assess community-level differences at each depth strata. Species richness per deployment was pooled into four categories (shallow/deep and eDNA/visual), and differences in species richness, community composition, detection probabilities, and the habitat of species detected were compared. Community overlap between methods was low (7.7% similarity for shallow, 1.4% for deep), though this is similar to previous surveys from shallow reef fishes. eDNA and visual surveys observed different community composition and species richness for the shallow site, with eDNA detecting more pelagic species compared to visual surveys. Certain groups (families Etmopteridae Pentanchidae, Setarchidae, and Triacathodidae) commonly observed from visual surveys were absent from eDNA metabarcoding and occupancy models for a subset of species revealed different detection probabilities between methods, possibly due to different eDNA shedding rates and the need for additional eDNA sampling replicates. While the amount of eDNA in the environment roughly correlates to fish abundance, offshore currents, vertical mixing, and colder water temperatures within the deep sea could proliferate eDNA further from the source which may have contributed to the differences in community composition between methods. Utilizing multiple methodologies increased overall species richness, though more work is needed to determine the full fish community and to examine differences in community composition between survey platforms.

Read on the original site

Open the publisher's page for the full experience

View original article